What is Engineering Simulation? The Complete Guide to CAE & FEA
Learn what engineering simulation is, FEA, CFD, and CAE capabilities. Guide to simulation-driven design from 20+ years of research.
Engineering simulation enables organizations to predict product performance before building physical prototypes. From stress analysis to fluid dynamics to thermal behavior, simulation answers critical questions about how designs will perform in the real world—reducing costs, accelerating development, and improving product quality.
This guide covers everything you need to know about engineering simulation: what it is, key simulation types including FEA and CFD, the simulation workflow, available tools, and how to implement simulation-driven design.
What is Engineering Simulation?
Engineering simulation uses computational methods to model and predict the physical behavior of products and systems. Instead of building and testing physical prototypes, engineers create virtual models and subject them to simulated conditions—loads, temperatures, fluid flows, and more.
Simulation answers questions that CAD alone cannot:
- Will it break? Structural analysis predicts stresses and failure modes
- Will it overheat? Thermal simulation shows temperature distributions
- How will fluids behave? CFD predicts flow patterns and pressures
- Will it vibrate excessively? Dynamic analysis reveals resonance issues
- How will components interact? Multiphysics couples multiple phenomena
The umbrella term CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) encompasses all simulation software, while specific disciplines have their own terminology—FEA for structures, CFD for fluids, and so on.
Types of Simulation
Engineering simulation spans multiple physics disciplines, each addressing different aspects of product behavior.
Structural Analysis (FEA)
The most common simulation type, structural analysis predicts:
- Stress and strain: Where material is under load
- Deformation: How parts bend or stretch
- Factor of safety: Margin against failure
- Fatigue life: Cycles until crack initiation
- Buckling: Stability under compressive loads
Structural FEA applies to virtually every mechanical product.
Thermal Analysis
Thermal simulation addresses heat-related phenomena:
- Temperature distribution: Hot and cold spots
- Heat transfer modes: Conduction, convection, radiation
- Transient response: How temperatures change over time
- Thermal stress: Expansion-induced loads
- Cooling effectiveness: Heat sink and airflow performance
Electronics cooling, engine components, and HVAC systems rely heavily on thermal analysis.
Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
CFD simulates liquids and gases:
- Flow patterns: Streamlines, velocity fields
- Pressure drops: Losses through systems
- Aerodynamics: Drag, lift, downforce
- Mixing: Combining fluids or gases
- Multiphase flows: Bubbles, droplets, particles
Automotive, aerospace, and process industries use CFD extensively.
Electromagnetic Simulation
EM simulation covers electrical and magnetic phenomena:
- Electric fields: Voltage distributions
- Magnetic fields: Motor and actuator performance
- Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC): Interference between systems
- Antenna performance: Radiation patterns
- Signal integrity: High-speed electronics behavior
Multibody Dynamics
Mechanism simulation predicts motion:
- Kinematic analysis: Range of motion, paths
- Dynamic analysis: Forces during operation
- Contact and collision: Impacts between bodies
- Flexible bodies: Combining mechanism and structural effects
Vehicle suspensions, robots, and packaging machinery benefit from dynamics simulation.
Multiphysics
Real products involve coupled phenomena:
- Thermal-structural: Heat causes expansion causes stress
- Fluid-structure interaction: Flow forces deform structures
- Electro-thermal: Current causes heating
Multiphysics simulation captures these interactions that single-physics analysis misses.
FEA Explained
Finite Element Analysis deserves deeper explanation given its widespread use.
How FEA Works
FEA divides complex geometry into a mesh of simple elements:
- Preprocessing: Create geometry, apply mesh, define materials, set boundary conditions
- Solution: Solver calculates behavior of each element, assembles into system response
- Postprocessing: Visualize and interpret results
The “finite element” name comes from dividing the infinite number of points in a solid into a finite number of elements for numerical solution.
Mesh Quality Matters
The mesh—the division of geometry into elements—critically affects results:
- Element types: Tetrahedra, hexahedra, shells, beams
- Mesh density: More elements = more accuracy but longer solve time
- Element quality: Aspect ratios, angles affect accuracy
- Mesh convergence: Verify results don’t change with finer mesh
Poor mesh quality can produce misleading results regardless of solver sophistication.
Linear vs Nonlinear
FEA falls into categories based on assumptions:
Linear FEA assumes:
- Small deformations (geometry doesn’t change significantly)
- Linear material behavior (stress proportional to strain)
- Constant boundary conditions
Nonlinear FEA handles:
- Large deformations (rubber, sheet metal forming)
- Nonlinear materials (plasticity, hyperelasticity)
- Contact between parts
- Load-dependent boundary conditions
Nonlinear analysis requires more expertise and computational resources but models reality more accurately for many problems.
Static vs Dynamic
Static analysis assumes loads are applied slowly—equilibrium at each instant. Most structural FEA is static.
Dynamic analysis captures time-varying effects:
- Modal analysis: Natural frequencies and mode shapes
- Harmonic response: Behavior under oscillating loads
- Transient dynamics: Response to time-varying forces
- Random vibration: Statistical vibration environments
Products experiencing vibration, impact, or rapidly varying loads require dynamic analysis.
CFD Explained
Computational Fluid Dynamics simulates fluid behavior through numerical methods.
How CFD Works
CFD solves conservation equations for mass, momentum, and energy:
- Geometry preparation: Create fluid domain (often extracting from CAD solid)
- Meshing: Divide domain into cells
- Physics setup: Turbulence model, boundary conditions, material properties
- Solution: Iterate until convergence
- Postprocessing: Visualize flow fields, extract quantities
CFD solves the Navier-Stokes equations numerically—equations too complex for analytical solution except in simple cases.
Turbulence Modeling
Most engineering flows are turbulent, requiring models to capture effects:
- RANS models: Average turbulent fluctuations (k-epsilon, k-omega SST)
- LES: Resolve large eddies, model small ones
- DNS: Resolve all scales (computationally prohibitive for most problems)
Turbulence model selection significantly affects accuracy and computational cost.
Internal vs External Flow
Internal flow: Fluid inside boundaries (pipes, ducts, channels)
- Pressure drop calculations
- Flow distribution
- Heat exchanger performance
External flow: Fluid around objects (vehicles, buildings, aircraft)
- Aerodynamic forces
- Wake patterns
- Surface pressures
Different physics emphasis for each type.
Steady-State vs Transient
Steady-state CFD: Time-averaged behavior, faster to solve, appropriate when conditions don’t change.
Transient CFD: Time-varying behavior, captures unsteady phenomena like vortex shedding, pulsating flows, startup/shutdown.
Simulation Workflow
Effective simulation follows a structured process.
1. Define Objectives
Before modeling, clarify what you need to learn:
- What questions must simulation answer?
- What decisions depend on results?
- What accuracy is required?
- What is the acceptable computational budget?
Clear objectives prevent wasted effort on unnecessary detail.
2. Geometry Preparation
CAD geometry rarely translates directly to simulation:
- Defeaturing: Remove small features that don’t affect results
- Idealization: Replace thin solids with shells, beams
- Fluid extraction: Create the fluid domain from solid geometry
- Cleanup: Fix gaps, overlaps, sliver faces
Geometry preparation often consumes significant project time.
3. Meshing
Create appropriate discretization:
- Global mesh size: Based on geometry scale and accuracy needs
- Local refinement: Finer mesh where gradients are steep
- Mesh type selection: Match element type to geometry and physics
- Quality checking: Verify elements meet quality metrics
Invest time in good meshes—they’re foundation of accurate results.
4. Physics Setup
Define the problem:
- Material properties: Density, modulus, conductivity, etc.
- Boundary conditions: Loads, constraints, inlets, outlets
- Initial conditions: Starting state for transient problems
- Solver settings: Convergence criteria, time steps
5. Solution
Run the analysis:
- Monitor convergence: Watch residuals, key quantities
- Check for errors: Divergence, element distortion, warnings
- Manage computational resources: Memory, parallelization
6. Postprocessing
Extract and interpret results:
- Visualization: Contour plots, vectors, streamlines
- Quantitative extraction: Maximum values, averages, integrals
- Validation checks: Do results make physical sense?
- Documentation: Capture key findings and assumptions
7. Validation
Build confidence in predictions:
- Mesh convergence study: Verify results don’t change with finer mesh
- Comparison to tests: Correlate with physical measurements when available
- Sensitivity analysis: Understand how inputs affect outputs
Simulation-Driven Design
Moving simulation earlier in development transforms its value.
Traditional vs Simulation-Driven
Traditional approach: Design in CAD → build prototype → test → find problems → redesign. Simulation used only for final validation.
Simulation-driven: Simulate during concept design → optimize during detail design → validate before prototype → test confirms predictions. Simulation guides decisions throughout.
Benefits of Early Simulation
- Catch problems earlier: Changes cost less early in development
- Explore more alternatives: Virtual testing enables broader design space exploration
- Reduce prototypes: Fewer physical builds when simulation predicts behavior
- Improve performance: Optimization based on analysis rather than intuition
Implementation Challenges
Shifting left requires overcoming barriers:
- Tool accessibility: Analysts often gatekeep simulation tools
- Skill gaps: Designers lack simulation training
- Process changes: Workflows must accommodate simulation loops
- Cultural shifts: “Design then validate” mindset is entrenched
Democratization Trend
The industry moves toward broader simulation access:
- CAD-embedded simulation: Basic analysis in the design environment
- Guided workflows: Templates reduce expertise requirements
- Cloud computing: On-demand capacity removes hardware barriers
- Automated meshing: Reduces preprocessing skill requirements
Simulation Tools & Software
The simulation market offers tools for various needs.
Enterprise CAE
ANSYS Comprehensive multiphysics platform. Market leader in structural, CFD, and electromagnetic simulation. Strong high-fidelity capabilities and extensive physics coupling.
Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes) Premium nonlinear FEA with exceptional accuracy for complex material behavior and contact. Dominant in automotive crashworthiness and rubber/polymer applications.
Siemens Simcenter Broad portfolio spanning FEA (NX Nastran), CFD (STAR-CCM+), system simulation, and test integration. Part of Xcelerator portfolio.
Mainstream Simulation
SolidWorks Simulation CAD-integrated FEA accessible to designers. Good for linear analysis and thermal studies. Part of SolidWorks ecosystem.
Autodesk CFD/Nastran Cloud-connected simulation integrated with Inventor and Fusion 360. Accessible pricing for mid-market.
Altair HyperWorks suite covering optimization, FEA, CFD, and multibody dynamics. Strong in optimization and lightweight design.
Specialized Tools
COMSOL Multiphysics Equation-based multiphysics platform enabling custom physics coupling. Popular in academia and research.
OpenFOAM Open-source CFD with extensive capability. No license cost but requires expertise to use effectively.
Tool Selection Criteria
| Criterion | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Physics coverage | Must support required analysis types |
| Accuracy requirements | Some problems demand high-fidelity tools |
| CAD integration | Geometry transfer workflow efficiency |
| User skill level | Enterprise tools require more expertise |
| Computational resources | License and hardware costs |
| Support ecosystem | Training, consulting, community |
Common Challenges
Simulation adoption faces recurring obstacles.
Geometry Preparation Bottleneck
CAD-to-simulation geometry transfer consumes excessive time:
- Native CAD contains manufacturing detail irrelevant to analysis
- Defeaturing requires judgment calls
- Meshing fails on poor geometry quality
Solutions include better CAD practices, automated defeaturing, and simulation-specific geometry tools.
Skill Gaps
Simulation requires physics knowledge beyond tool operation:
- Understanding what to model and what to ignore
- Selecting appropriate element types and mesh density
- Interpreting results critically
- Recognizing when results are suspect
Training and mentorship address skill gaps over time.
Validation Uncertainty
Without physical test correlation, simulation predictions carry uncertainty:
- Material properties from databases may not match actual material
- Boundary conditions approximate real loading
- Simplifications introduce unknown errors
Systematic validation against tests builds confidence.
Computational Costs
High-fidelity analysis demands resources:
- Hardware investment (workstations, HPC)
- License costs for commercial software
- Engineering time for complex setup
- Calendar time for long solves
Cloud computing and efficient methods help manage computational demands.
Industry Trends
Several trends shape simulation’s evolution.
Cloud HPC
Cloud computing transforms simulation economics:
- Burst capacity: Scale up for large jobs, pay only when running
- Eliminate hardware: No workstation or cluster investment
- Collaboration: Share models and results across locations
Cloud adoption accelerates as security concerns decrease.
AI and Machine Learning
ML augments traditional simulation:
- Surrogate models: Trained on simulation data for instant predictions
- Physics-informed neural networks: Blend data and physics
- Automated meshing: ML-driven mesh generation
- Result interpretation: Pattern recognition for quality assessment
AI won’t replace physics-based simulation but will accelerate and augment it.
Digital Twins
Simulation connects to operational products:
- Model updating: Calibrate simulations with sensor data
- Predictive maintenance: Forecast remaining life
- What-if analysis: Evaluate operational scenarios
- Design feedback: Operational data improves next-generation design
Digital twins extend simulation value beyond development.
Democratization
Simulation expands beyond specialist analysts:
- CAD-embedded tools: Analysis where designers work
- Guided workflows: Templates reduce expertise barriers
- Automated recommendations: AI-assisted setup
- Results interpretation aids: Help non-experts understand outputs
Broader access multiplies simulation’s organizational impact.
Getting Started with Simulation
For organizations building or improving simulation capabilities:
Assess Current State
Understand your starting point:
- What simulation is currently performed?
- Who has simulation skills?
- What are the pain points and gaps?
- How does simulation connect to design processes?
Define Strategy
Clarify objectives:
- Which physics disciplines matter most?
- Should simulation enable design exploration or final validation?
- What accuracy levels are required?
- Build internal capability or outsource?
Start with Pilots
Test before full commitment:
- Select representative projects for pilot
- Measure time, cost, and outcome quality
- Gather user feedback
- Refine approach based on learning
Invest in People
Tools accomplish nothing without skilled users:
- Formal training on software operation
- Physics fundamentals for those lacking background
- Mentorship from experienced analysts
- Ongoing skill development
Integrate with Design Process
Embed simulation in workflows:
- Define when simulation occurs in development phases
- Establish handoff processes for geometry and results
- Create standards for model documentation
- Build feedback loops from simulation to design
Related Resources
Explore our in-depth articles on simulation topics:
- What is Simulation-Driven Design?
- How to Improve Designs by Compressing Simulation Analysis
- The Best Simulation Toolbox: Integrated Suite or Granular Apps?
- Top 4 Factors to Unlock Simulation-Driven Design
Browse all simulation articles for the latest research and analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is engineering simulation?
Engineering simulation uses computational methods to predict how products will behave under real-world conditions before physical prototypes are built. It includes structural analysis (FEA), fluid dynamics (CFD), thermal analysis, and other physics-based assessments that help engineers optimize designs and reduce development costs.
What is FEA?
FEA (Finite Element Analysis) is a computational method that divides complex geometry into small elements to calculate stresses, strains, and deformations under load. FEA predicts how parts will respond to forces, vibration, heat, and other physical effects—enabling engineers to verify designs will meet requirements before manufacturing.
What is CFD?
CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulates fluid flow, heat transfer, and related phenomena. Engineers use CFD to analyze aerodynamics, cooling systems, HVAC, and any application involving liquids or gases. CFD solves the Navier-Stokes equations numerically to predict flow patterns, pressures, and temperatures.
What is the difference between CAE and FEA?
CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) is the broad category encompassing all engineering analysis software. FEA is one type of CAE focused on structural analysis. CAE also includes CFD for fluids, multibody dynamics for mechanisms, electromagnetic simulation, and other physics disciplines.
What is simulation-driven design?
Simulation-driven design integrates analysis early and continuously throughout product development rather than using simulation only for final validation. Engineers run simulations during concept and detailed design phases, using results to guide geometry decisions. This approach catches problems earlier when changes cost less.
What are the benefits of engineering simulation?
Simulation reduces physical prototypes, shortens development cycles, improves product performance, lowers testing costs, and enables exploration of more design alternatives. It catches problems before manufacturing when fixes are cheaper. Studies show simulation can reduce prototype iterations by 50% or more.
What skills are needed for engineering simulation?
Effective simulation requires understanding of physics fundamentals (mechanics, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics), numerical methods basics, the specific simulation software, and engineering judgment to interpret results. Domain expertise matters—knowing what questions to ask and whether results make physical sense.
How accurate is engineering simulation?
Simulation accuracy depends on model quality, mesh refinement, material properties, boundary conditions, and appropriate physics selection. Well-constructed simulations typically predict real-world behavior within 5-15%. Validation against physical tests builds confidence in simulation predictions.
What is the difference between linear and nonlinear FEA?
Linear FEA assumes small deformations, linear material behavior, and constant boundary conditions—fast to solve but limited applicability. Nonlinear FEA handles large deformations, plastic materials, contact between parts, and changing conditions—more computationally intensive but necessary for realistic analysis of many designs.
Do I need simulation if I have CAD?
CAD defines geometry—what the product looks like. Simulation predicts performance—how it will behave. While some CAD packages include basic simulation, dedicated CAE tools provide deeper analysis capabilities. Simulation answers questions CAD cannot: Will it break? Will it overheat? How will air flow around it?
Related Articles
Deep dives on specific topics in this guide
What is Mechanical Computer Aided Engineering (MCAE)?
Mechanical Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) software is used to simulate and improve the physical performance or manufacturing production of a mechanical c...
Read article arrow_forward BlogHow Detailed Design and Simulation Traceability Will Save Your Organization Time and Money
Amid an evolving and increasingly complex production landscape, organizations are constantly seeking opportunities to save time and money. A recent Lifecy...
Read article arrow_forward ResearchSimulation Process and Data Management Quantitative Study
About the Study: Lifecycle Insights conducted the Simulation Process and Data Management Quantitative Study. The goal is to identify the company's process...
Read article arrow_forward BlogIs Altair Transforming the Simulation Process using Artificial Intelligence?
Simulation has truly revolutionized the way we approach solving complex problems and building powerful products. Engineers & designers can simulate va...
Read article arrow_forward BlogGuided simulation workflows - A shift-left simulation strategy
Engineers are increasingly adopting simulation early in the design process. And it’s easy to see why this shift-left strategy is gaining popularity. Simula...
Read article arrow_forward BlogOnshape - Three Key Features That Will Be Released This Year
Onshape has added new capabilities to allow engineers to model and share designs using global variables and mesh geometry....
Read article arrow_forward BlogDassault Systèmes’ 3DEXPERIENCE - A Progressive Approach to Modeling and Simulation
In a recent post, we discussed the challenges associated with a traditional approach to simulation where engineers and analysts work in silos using uninteg...
Read article arrow_forward BlogThe Fundamental Problems with Modeling and Simulation
Amid a landscape of shortened timelines and more complex products, companies are increasingly using simulation to digitally verify that a product meets req...
Read article arrow_forward BlogANSYS Discovery - Enhancing Simulation-Driven Product Development for Design Engineers and Analysts
ANSYS Discovery’s latest release introduces a new set of capabilities augmenting the experience for design engineers and analysts. Now both parties can sea...
Read article arrow_forward BlogAras Innovator - The Advantages of Accessing Simulation Data in Your Product Lifecycle Management Solution
As part of technology-led initiatives, many engineering organizations have adopted both simulation and product lifecycle management (PLM) to help drive and...
Read article arrow_forward BlogAltair One - Consolidating Simulation, Analytics, and HPC for the Expert Analyst
High-performance computing (HPC). Artificial intelligence (AI).
Read article arrow_forward BlogThe Lifecycle of Systems Simulation
Manufacturers are using systems engineering approaches to mitigate the complexity of developing increasingly sophisticated products. Systems simulation is...
Read article arrow_forward BlogSolution Provider Landscape for Simulation-Driven Design
When the simulation-driven design movement first started, there was only one way to enable it: putting hybrid CAD-CAE solutions in the hands of engineers....
Read article arrow_forward BlogUsing Simulation-Driven Design to Power Digital Engineering
Customer demands and marketplace competition are placing engineers under mounting time pressures. An organization’s development schedules must shorten to k...
Read article arrow_forward BlogSimulation-Driven Design - Feasible or Fallacy?
Today’s engineers are in a tight spot. From smartphones to conveyor belts and coffee pots, today’s products are increasingly complex. They often meld mecha...
Read article arrow_forwardGet Research-Backed Guidance
Join InsightEX for independent insight on engineering transformation. No vendor bias, just what works.
Join InsightEX →